The AI failure recordevery report states whether its source is attached
ChatGPT DisasterThe AI failure record
Standards

Corrections Policy

Accuracy matters, especially on topics involving health, safety, lawsuits, financial harm, and named people or companies. If something is wrong, incomplete, outdated, or missing context, request a correction.

What To Send

  • The URL of the page.
  • The exact sentence or claim you believe needs correction.
  • Supporting documentation, preferably a primary source.
  • Whether you are requesting a factual correction, clarification, update, privacy review, or right-of-reply.

Correction Standard

Material factual errors should be corrected directly on the page. Significant updates should preserve reader trust by noting what changed and when. Minor copy edits may be made silently when they do not alter the substance of the article.

Corrections Log

10 September 2026 — Fabricated user testimonials removed. An automated script that had been running daily on this site generated user complaints from a hardcoded list and published them as if they were real posts, complete with invented usernames, invented upvote and comment counts, and the date they were generated. Fifteen such entries were live: five on stories page 2 and ten on stories page 3. They have been permanently deleted, and the script that produced them has been stripped of the material it drew on so that it cannot recur. No entry on this site should ever have carried an invented username, an invented engagement figure, or a quotation that cannot be traced to a real source. A wider audit of the remaining testimonial pages is underway, and entries that cannot be traced to a verifiable source will be removed rather than relabelled.

Use the contact page to submit correction requests: contact ChatGPT Disaster.