The AI failure recordevery report states whether its source is attached
ChatGPT DisasterThe AI failure record
Standards

Method, corrections and disclosure

Bylines

Reports are filed by desk, not by an individual. No personal name appears here.

What counts as a source

A primary document: the docket, the filing, the order, the status page, the study, the agency release. Every report shows its sourcing status, generated from the page rather than typed in. Reports that carry no retrievable source are marked SOURCE NEEDED, kept out of the databases, and excluded from search indexing until a source is attached.

Firsthand accounts

An account appears there only if it links to a public post that resolves. A username is shown only where we confirmed it against the live post; otherwise the card cites the thread. Engagement figures are never shown: a vote count is a moving number and cannot be presented as permanent fact.

AI disclosure

This site uses AI tooling in research and drafting. What is never AI-generated: quotations, source links, figures, dates, case details, and accounts attributed to real people.

Corrections

10 September 2026. Fifteen fabricated user testimonials generated by an automated script were permanently removed, the script was stripped of the material it drew on, and every unverifiable username and engagement figure was taken off the remaining cards.

Contact

editor@chatgptdisaster.com