Editorial Policy

Our editorial goal is to document AI failures aggressively while keeping the evidence trail clear. The site can have a point of view, but factual claims should be traceable to sources.

Evidence Labels

• Primary source: court filing, regulatory document, company statement, status page, research paper, dataset, transcript, or original document.
• Mainstream reporting: established news organizations, trade publications, or specialist outlets with named authors and editorial accountability.
• User-submitted: direct reader submissions, social media posts, forums, Reddit comments, or anonymous accounts. These are treated as testimony unless independently verified.
• Editorial analysis: our interpretation of documented events, user reports, or product behavior.

Sensitive Claims

Articles involving suicide, self-harm, mental health, medical advice, legal advice, financial loss, minors, or named private individuals require extra care. We avoid presenting allegations as proven facts unless they have been established by a court, regulator, company admission, or other authoritative source.

Independence

We do not represent OpenAI or any AI company. If affiliate links, sponsorships, consulting offers, or paid placements are ever used, they should be disclosed on the relevant page.