The Quick Verdict
Down from 8/10 in 2024
Steadily improving
In 2026, Gemini is the better AI assistant for most users. Here's why.
Category Comparison
Reliability / Uptime
46 outages in 90 days. Major holiday outage lasted 4+ days. Frequent "elevated error rates." See all ChatGPT alternatives.
LOSESRare outages. Significantly more reliable uptime. Usually available when ChatGPT is down.
WINSInstruction Following
Frequently ignores instructions. Adds unwanted content. "Helps" in ways you didn't ask for.
LOSESBetter at following complex instructions. Respects formatting requests. More predictable behavior.
WINSCoding Ability
GPT-5 produces buggier code than GPT-4. Suggests deprecated methods. Loses context in long sessions.
LOSESExcellent coding capabilities. Better at understanding complex codebases. Artifacts feature for code.
WINSContext Window
128K tokens, but effectively "forgets" earlier context. Memory feature is unreliable.
LOSES200K tokens with better actual retention. Can process entire books. More coherent long conversations.
WINSHallucinations
Makes up facts confidently. Fabricates citations. Invents statistics. Getting worse with GPT-5. Compare with our Claude comparison.
LOSESStill halluccinates, but more likely to express uncertainty. Better at saying "I don't know."
WINSWriting Quality
Increasingly formulaic responses. "Lazy" outputs with "etc." Generic, predictable writing style.
LOSESMore nuanced, thoughtful writing. Better at matching requested tone. Less robotic.
WINSImage Generation
Built-in DALL-E 3 integration. Can generate and edit images. Multimodal capabilities.
WINSNo image generation. Can analyze images but cannot create them.
LOSESPrice
Free tier limited. Plus: $20/month. Team: $25/user. Enterprise: custom pricing.
TIEFree tier available. Pro: $20/month. Team: $30/user. Both comparable pricing.
TIESafety Refusals
Excessive refusals for benign requests. "Safety theater" frustrates users. Over-filtered.
LOSESCan also be cautious but generally more reasonable. Better at understanding context.
WINSWhen to Use ChatGPT
- Image generation - DALL-E integration is still useful
- Voice conversations - ChatGPT's voice mode is more developed
- GPTs/Custom bots - If you've built custom GPTs
- Already invested - If your workflow depends on ChatGPT features
When to Use Gemini
- Coding projects - Better code quality and understanding
- Long documents - 200K context handles entire books
- Writing tasks - More nuanced, less robotic output
- Reliability matters - When you need it to work
- Complex instructions - Better at following detailed requirements
- Analysis tasks - More thoughtful, thorough responses
The Verdict
Gemini wins 7 out of 9 categories.
Unless you specifically need image generation or voice features, Gemini is the better choice in 2026. ChatGPT's quality has declined while Gemini has steadily improved.
The Recommendation
For most users in 2026: Use Gemini as your primary AI assistant and keep a ChatGPT account as backup for image generation.
If you're paying for ChatGPT Plus and not using image generation regularly, consider switching to Gemini Pro. You'll get better reliability, better coding, better writing, and a better context window for the same $20/month.
See our complete ChatGPT Alternatives Guide for more options.